KUBR

CEO and director banned for falsifying documents in bid to acquire bank and football club

Blue Horizon Asset Management Limited · asset management

Forged documentsFunding shock

The case in brief

Visible before detection

    Checks that could have surfaced it, on hindsight

    1

    Document authenticity / direct pull

    Direct verification of bond portfolio and ownership would reveal falsification

    Can mislead when: The company can refuse consent, and a refusal is itself a flag. Some banks and co-op banks are not on AA yet.

    2

    Third-party confirmation

    Bank verification of €200m portfolio would reveal false claims

    Can mislead when: Counterparties can collude or ignore requests. A non-response is logged as a gap, never as a pass.

    Where Kubr services would have helped

    Valuation context

    Offered in India
    • Peer multiples and the exit-multiple bridge would have shown how much of the story relied on valuation holding.

    Financial diligence

    Offered in India
    • C5 Direct verification of bond portfolio and ownership would reveal falsification

    IC note

    Offered in India
    • C5 Direct verification of bond portfolio and ownership would reveal falsification

    Mapped from the checks each service runs. A hindsight reading of public records, not a promise that the failure would have been found.

    A summary of public documents. It reports what the sources say. It is not Kubr's finding and not a statement of guilt.