KUBR

Otipy shut down after a funding round failed

Otipy (Crofarm Agriproducts) · Agritech / farm-to-consumer commerce

Unit economicsFunding shock

The case in brief

Visible before detection

    Checks that could have surfaced it, on hindsight

    1

    Unit economics & burn

    Would have shown losses at about a third of revenue.

    Can mislead when: Cost allocation is a judgement call. Kubr shows its assumptions and lets the user change them.

    2

    Bank credits vs books

    Would have shown vendor dues building up in cash flows.

    Can mislead when: AA only sees the accounts the company links, so an undisclosed account stays invisible. Cash-heavy businesses and timing differences create false flags.

    Where Kubr services would have helped

    Valuation context

    Offered in India
    • C9 Would have shown losses at about a third of revenue.

    Financial diligence

    Offered in India
    • C1 Would have shown vendor dues building up in cash flows.
    • C9 Would have shown losses at about a third of revenue.

    Model check

    Offered in India
    • C1 Would have shown vendor dues building up in cash flows.
    • C9 Would have shown losses at about a third of revenue.

    Portfolio monitor

    Offered in India
    • C1 Would have shown vendor dues building up in cash flows.

    Mapped from the checks each service runs. A hindsight reading of public records, not a promise that the failure would have been found.

    A summary of public documents. It reports what the sources say. It is not Kubr's finding and not a statement of guilt.