KUBR

Opes Prime collapsed in Mar 2008 owing over A$1bn to lenders

Opes Prime Group · Securities lending and stockbroking

Double pledgeConcealed debtFunding shock

The case in brief

Visible before detection

    Checks that could have surfaced it, on hindsight

    1

    Collateral & double pledge

    Would have shown that the same shares stood as collateral for multiple parties.

    Can mislead when: Pledges made off the registries stay invisible, and vague invoice descriptions are hard to match.

    2

    Third-party confirmation

    Would have confirmed holdings with custodians and lenders.

    Can mislead when: Counterparties can collude or ignore requests. A non-response is logged as a gap, never as a pass.

    3

    Document authenticity / direct pull

    Would have read the client agreements on title transfer.

    Can mislead when: The company can refuse consent, and a refusal is itself a flag. Some banks and co-op banks are not on AA yet.

    Where Kubr services would have helped

    Valuation context

    Offered in India
    • Peer multiples and the exit-multiple bridge would have shown how much of the story relied on valuation holding.

    Verified Snapshot

    Offered in India
    • C13 Would have shown that the same shares stood as collateral for multiple parties.

    Financial diligence

    Offered in India
    • C5 Would have read the client agreements on title transfer.

    Legal diligence support

    Offered in India
    • C13 Would have shown that the same shares stood as collateral for multiple parties.

    Mapped from the checks each service runs. A hindsight reading of public records, not a promise that the failure would have been found.

    A summary of public documents. It reports what the sources say. It is not Kubr's finding and not a statement of guilt.