KUBR

FCA fined Wood Group GBP 13 million over inaccurate FY22, FY23 and HY24 results

John Wood Group PLC · Listed engineering and consulting services

Revenue inflationGovernance failureRegulatory breach

The case in brief

Visible before detection

    Checks that could have surfaced it, on hindsight

    1

    Operating-metric verification

    Project cost-to-complete and savings estimates would be tested against actual project progress.

    Can mislead when: Contract staff do not appear in EPFO. Vahan access needs licensed APIs. Some businesses have no physical trace.

    2

    Governance signals

    Pressure to maintain stated results and weak control over judgements would show in governance reviews.

    Can mislead when: Private companies file late, so these signals are lagging. Kubr uses them to support other flags, not to prove anything alone.

    3

    Books edit log

    Late journal entries releasing provisions would appear in the books edit log.

    Can mislead when: Logs can be disabled at database level (auditors qualified this in year one) or tampered with on export. Kubr needs the company to cooperate.

    4

    Third-party confirmation

    Customer confirmations of project balances would test the debit amounts held.

    Can mislead when: Counterparties can collude or ignore requests. A non-response is logged as a gap, never as a pass.

    Where Kubr services would have helped

    Valuation context

    Offered in India
    • C11 Pressure to maintain stated results and weak control over judgements would show in governance reviews.

    Financial diligence

    Offered in India
    • C10 Project cost-to-complete and savings estimates would be tested against actual project progress.
    • C12 Late journal entries releasing provisions would appear in the books edit log.

    Portfolio monitor

    Offered in India
    • C10 Project cost-to-complete and savings estimates would be tested against actual project progress.
    • C11 Pressure to maintain stated results and weak control over judgements would show in governance reviews.

    Verified Snapshot

    Offered in India
    • C11 Pressure to maintain stated results and weak control over judgements would show in governance reviews.

    Mapped from the checks each service runs. A hindsight reading of public records, not a promise that the failure would have been found.

    A summary of public documents. It reports what the sources say. It is not Kubr's finding and not a statement of guilt.