KUBR

MAS shuts Falcon Bank Singapore over 1MDB-related AML failures

Falcon Private Bank Ltd (Singapore Branch) · Private bank

Regulatory breachGovernance failure

The case in brief

Visible before detection

    Checks that could have surfaced it, on hindsight

    1

    Regulatory & litigation records

    Regulator records would show prior AML inspection findings for the bank.

    Can mislead when: Court records lag and name spellings vary. A clean record can mean the problem has not reached court yet.

    2

    Governance signals

    Management interference in customer accounts would show in governance reviews.

    Can mislead when: Private companies file late, so these signals are lagging. Kubr uses them to support other flags, not to prove anything alone.

    3

    End-use tracing of funds

    Tracing the end use of incoming funds would show diversion from the state fund.

    Can mislead when: Kubr sees only the company's own accounts. Once money reaches a third party's bank, Kubr can flag the payee but cannot see the next hop without that party's consent.

    Where Kubr services would have helped

    Borrower monitor

    Offered in India
    • C6 Tracing the end use of incoming funds would show diversion from the state fund.
    • C8 Regulator records would show prior AML inspection findings for the bank.
    • C11 Management interference in customer accounts would show in governance reviews.

    Verified Snapshot

    Offered in India
    • C8 Regulator records would show prior AML inspection findings for the bank.
    • C11 Management interference in customer accounts would show in governance reviews.

    Legal diligence support

    Offered in India
    • C8 Regulator records would show prior AML inspection findings for the bank.
    • C11 Management interference in customer accounts would show in governance reviews.

    Promoter profiles

    Offered in India
    • C8 Regulator records would show prior AML inspection findings for the bank.
    • C11 Management interference in customer accounts would show in governance reviews.

    Mapped from the checks each service runs. A hindsight reading of public records, not a promise that the failure would have been found.

    A summary of public documents. It reports what the sources say. It is not Kubr's finding and not a statement of guilt.