KUBR

EOH won government tenders through a 'corruption infested' bidding process

EOH Group (now iOCO) · IT services (listed)

Related-party diversionRegulatory breachGovernance failure

The case in brief

Visible before detection

    Checks that could have surfaced it, on hindsight

    1

    End-use tracing of funds

    Would have traced payments to intermediaries.

    Can mislead when: Kubr sees only the company's own accounts. Once money reaches a third party's bank, Kubr can flag the payee but cannot see the next hop without that party's consent.

    2

    Operating-metric verification

    Would have tested delivery against contract billing.

    Can mislead when: Contract staff do not appear in EPFO. Vahan access needs licensed APIs. Some businesses have no physical trace.

    3

    Regulatory & litigation records

    Would have tracked procurement investigations.

    Can mislead when: Court records lag and name spellings vary. A clean record can mean the problem has not reached court yet.

    Where Kubr services would have helped

    Portfolio monitor

    Offered in India
    • C8 Would have tracked procurement investigations.
    • C10 Would have tested delivery against contract billing.

    Borrower monitor

    Offered in India
    • C6 Would have traced payments to intermediaries.
    • C8 Would have tracked procurement investigations.

    Proceeds tracer

    Offered in India
    • C6 Would have traced payments to intermediaries.
    • C10 Would have tested delivery against contract billing.

    Verified Snapshot

    Offered in India
    • C8 Would have tracked procurement investigations.

    Mapped from the checks each service runs. A hindsight reading of public records, not a promise that the failure would have been found.

    A summary of public documents. It reports what the sources say. It is not Kubr's finding and not a statement of guilt.