KUBR

Two brothers convicted over Collateral P2P platform that misused the FCA Register

Collateral (UK) Ltd · Peer-to-peer lending

Misuse of raised fundsRegulatory breachForged documents

The case in brief

Visible before detection

    Checks that could have surfaced it, on hindsight

    1

    Document authenticity / direct pull

    Would have pulled the FCA Register entry directly and seen the firm name and permissions did not match.

    Can mislead when: The company can refuse consent, and a refusal is itself a flag. Some banks and co-op banks are not on AA yet.

    2

    Regulatory & litigation records

    Would have shown the regulatory position and any FCA warnings.

    Can mislead when: Court records lag and name spellings vary. A clean record can mean the problem has not reached court yet.

    3

    Bank credits vs books

    Would have compared client money bank movements with the loan book.

    Can mislead when: AA only sees the accounts the company links, so an undisclosed account stays invisible. Cash-heavy businesses and timing differences create false flags.

    4

    End-use tracing of funds

    Would have traced withdrawals from client accounts.

    Can mislead when: Kubr sees only the company's own accounts. Once money reaches a third party's bank, Kubr can flag the payee but cannot see the next hop without that party's consent.

    Where Kubr services would have helped

    Borrower monitor

    Offered in India
    • C1 Would have compared client money bank movements with the loan book.
    • C6 Would have traced withdrawals from client accounts.
    • C8 Would have shown the regulatory position and any FCA warnings.

    Financial diligence

    Offered in India
    • C1 Would have compared client money bank movements with the loan book.
    • C5 Would have pulled the FCA Register entry directly and seen the firm name and permissions did not match.

    IC note

    Offered in India
    • C5 Would have pulled the FCA Register entry directly and seen the firm name and permissions did not match.
    • C8 Would have shown the regulatory position and any FCA warnings.

    Portfolio monitor

    Offered in India
    • C1 Would have compared client money bank movements with the loan book.
    • C8 Would have shown the regulatory position and any FCA warnings.

    Mapped from the checks each service runs. A hindsight reading of public records, not a promise that the failure would have been found.

    A summary of public documents. It reports what the sources say. It is not Kubr's finding and not a statement of guilt.