KUBR

BlockFi collapsed after FTX, which had become its rescuer and counterparty, failed

BlockFi · Crypto lender (private)

Funding shockConcealed debtRegulatory breach

The case in brief

Visible before detection

    Checks that could have surfaced it, on hindsight

    1

    Third-party confirmation

    Would have confirmed assets held at FTX directly.

    Can mislead when: Counterparties can collude or ignore requests. A non-response is logged as a gap, never as a pass.

    2

    Regulatory & litigation records

    Would have flagged the earlier regulatory settlement.

    Can mislead when: Court records lag and name spellings vary. A clean record can mean the problem has not reached court yet.

    3

    Operating-metric verification

    Would have measured exposure to one counterparty.

    Can mislead when: Contract staff do not appear in EPFO. Vahan access needs licensed APIs. Some businesses have no physical trace.

    Where Kubr services would have helped

    Valuation context

    Offered in India
    • C8 Would have flagged the earlier regulatory settlement.

    Portfolio monitor

    Offered in India
    • C8 Would have flagged the earlier regulatory settlement.
    • C10 Would have measured exposure to one counterparty.

    Verified Snapshot

    Offered in India
    • C8 Would have flagged the earlier regulatory settlement.

    Financial diligence

    Offered in India
    • C10 Would have measured exposure to one counterparty.

    Mapped from the checks each service runs. A hindsight reading of public records, not a promise that the failure would have been found.

    A summary of public documents. It reports what the sources say. It is not Kubr's finding and not a statement of guilt.